Friday, August 26, 2011

Positive Thinking & FAITH

 
QUOTES

On Positive Thinking

The Universe is constantly listening to our thoughts.
We must learn to maintain positive thoughts in our mind,
if we want the Universe to help us.
*
When you have come to the edge of all the light you have
And step into the darkness of the unknown
Believe that one of the two will happen to you:
Either you'll find something solid to stand on
Or you will be taught how to fly.
*
When all your efforts end in failure,
it means that you are being taught the lesson
that, not your own efforts,
but God's Grace alone can bring success.
And you should seek His Grace.

On FAITH:

Faith is the nearest English equivalent to the Sanskrit word Shraddha;
it endows us with great value in life.
It is the set of values, axioms, prejudices, and pre-possessions
that colours our perceptions, governs our thinking,
dictates our responses, and shapes our lives generally
without our even being aware of its presence and power.
Shraddha is not an intellectual abstraction;
it is our very substance.
*
Bhagavd Gita - Chapter17 slokam 3:
श्रद्धामयोऽयं पुरुषो यो यच्छ्रद्धः स एव सः।।17.3।।
"As a person's faith is, so is he"

     The Bible, using similar words, says:
     "As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he."
*
There is nothing passive about Shraddha.
It is full of potency.
For it prompts action, conditions behaviour, and
determines how we perceive and thus
respond to the world around us.
*
The power to heal or harm is inherent in our ideas of ourselves.
Yet Shraddha is not brute determination or wishful thinking.
Our lives are an eloquent expression of our beliefs of
what we deem worth having, doing, attaining, being.
What we strive for shows what we value.
We back our Shraddha with our time, our energy, our very lives.
Thus Shraddha determines destiny.
*
As the Buddha put it:
"All that we are is the result of what we thought.
We are made of our thoughts,
We are moulded by our thoughts."
*
As we think, so we become.
yat bhaavam tat bhavati

Monday, July 25, 2011

On: - the News Report report about the death of a famous singer, age 27:  

Today’s Metro Plus section of ‘The Hindu’ carries on its front-page the news of the death of Amy Winehouse, brilliant UK artist and Grammy award winner at the young age of 27.

Presumably, her drug, alcohol and marital problems were responsible for the tragic death. She became one of the most acclaimed young singers of the past decade, selling millions of albums, winning five Grammy Awards and starting a British retro-R&B trend that continues today. Yet, almost from the moment she arrived on the international pop scene in early 2007, she appeared to flirt with self-destruction. Strangely, she seemed to be 'frustrated with success'. In time, the notoriety from Ms. Winehouse’s various drug arrests, public meltdowns and ruined concerts overshadowed her talent as a musician, and her career never recovered. On Saturday, as the news of Ms. Winehouse’s death spread, many musicians wrote with sadness, but no surprise. She seemed unable to deal with her great succes early in her life, affirmng Oscar Wilde's wise observation: "There are only two tragedies in life: One is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it.”

‘The Hindu’ in the article titled ‘Broken Flower’ has stated:
“Winehouse dies at the age of 27, which is the same age when musical legends such as Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin, Kurt Cobain and Jim Morrison passed on. But even as conspiracy theorists welcome another member to ‘Death club 27', one can establish another clear link between all the pioneers. Despite their superior musical dexterity, a strong temptation made them deviate and become careless wrecks. Winehouse too, treaded this path and now leaves behind a legacy of music that thematically delved on everything her life was — painful yet ecstatic, but without regrets.” 

Why would many talented artists find difficulty and frustration in dealing with the fame and success they richly deserved and achieved? Is there a lesson for all of us from these failures to deal with success, which Oscar Wilde noted as being a weakness in human nature? Is there a strategy to counter this?

Perhaps, our sages have the answer in the lessons they have prescribed for practising Karma Yoga — the mental attitude to Work. In this context, there is great relevance in Ramana Maharishi’s advice in his Upadesa Saram slokam:

ईश्वरार्पितं नेच्छया कृतम् । Ishvaraarpitam na ichchayaa krutam
चित्त शोधकं मुक्तिसाधकम् ।। Chittha shodhakam mukti saadhakam

Actions consecrated to the Lord without attachment to the results, purify the mind and point the way to liberation, freedom from the binding mind. Bhagavad Gita too warns us in sloka VI-5 that our mind can be our best friend and also our worst enemy.

Taking credit for success boosts the ignorant ego (mind) and leads to self-destruction.

Self-confidence should mean confidence in the Higher Self, not in the ego-self created by us and uninitiated into true knowledge of the real purpose of this life, hence termed ignorant. The Kathopanishad advises us to hand over the reins of our Indriyas to the wise Self residing within us, instead of the uninstructed ego-mind:

Atmaanam rathinam viddhi shareeram rathameva tu
buddhim tu sarathim viddhi manah pragrahamevaca
indriyani hayanyahur vishayansteshu gocharaan
Atmendriya manoyuktam bhoktetyahur maneeshinah

Consider the body as a chariot with the Spirit (Atman) sitting in it as the passenger, the intellect as the driver who controls the horses (the Indriyas – organs), with the mind as the reins. When the mind (ego) acts in accordance with the instructions of the Atman, true knowledge dawns and harmony prevails in the travel along the life-path (sat-chit-anand). Only the mind liberated in this manner will be able to deal effectively with both success and failure. 

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Govinda! Govinda! Govinda!


The holy-chant: Govinda! Govinda! Govinda! is all-pervading in Tirumala Kshetram. While chanting Sri Vishnu Sahasranama Stotram, we meet with this holy Nama in
slokams 20 and 58. Readers of this Blog may be interested in the significance and meanings given by commentators on the Govinda Nama. The following extract is from
Govinda-Nama in Sri Vishnu Sahasranamam

Slokam 20:  Govindah

maheshvaaso maheebhartaa srinivasah sataamgatih
aniruddhah suraanando govindo govidaampatih   -20

a) One who is praised by the gods (for His help).
b) One who dug out the Earth from the depths of the Ocean.
c) The protector of cows.
d) One who confers the veda-s

Om govindAya namah.

go in samskRt means "Earth", "cows", "speech", or "veda-s" - gaur-vANI, dharA, dhenurvA. From this we derive gavAm, gAm, etc. vid - lAbhe to get, to find, to feel is the root from which vinda is derived.

a) gavAm vindah govindah - gavAm - praise, vindah - recipient. He is govinda because He is the recipient of praise by the gods for the help He renders as outlined in the previous nAma.
b) Another interpretation is gAm avindat - One who retrieved the Earth from the depths of the Ocean.
The following is from Santi parvam in mahAbhAratam -
nashTAm vai dharaNIm purvam avindam vai guhAgatAm
govinda iti tenAham devair-vAgbir-abhishTutah    (Santi - 330.5)

"I first rescued the earth which was carried away and hidden in depths of the Ocean (by an asura); hence I am praised by the appellation Govinda by gods and scriptures". The significance of this is pointed out by the dharma cakram writer: BhagavAn is the One who truly understands the world and all its subjects.

c) gAvo vedavANyo yam vindanti labhante, yatra vA avatisThante sa govindo bhagavAn vishNuh - One who is reached by vedic chanting, or One who is the abode of the veda-s, is govinda or vishNu. In harivamSa we have the following -
gaureshA tu yato vANI tAm ca vindayate bhavAn
govindastu tato deva! munibhih kathyate bhavAn!   (harivamSa 3.88.50)
gau means worlds.
You pervade all worlds giving them power. Sages, therefore, call you govinda.

d) The protector of the cows - again supported from harivamSa -

aham kilendro devAnAm tvam gavAm indratAm gatah
govinda iti lokAstvAm stoshyanti bhuvi SASvatam    (harivamSa 2.19.45)

"I am indra, leader of deva-s. You have attained the leadership of the cows. So in this world men praise you always addressing you as govinda". He is the protector of the cows and played the part ofgopAla in gokulam. SrI satyadevo vAsishTha points out that the leadership of cows also suggests the importance of milk, ghee, etc., in worship, yaj~na etc., and how these also play a key role in thenourishment of the world.

An author by name ananta kRshNa Sastri, who has translated SrI Sankara's vishNu sahasranAma vyAkhyAnam, gives 10 meanings for the combination go+vid - 1) go -svargam - He transcends Heaven.

2) arrows - He knows all the weapons. 3) cattle - He is the leader of cows. 4) Speech - He is to be known by the veda-s. 5) Thunderbolt - He has the vajra marks on His feet. 6) Quarters - He is known in

all quarters. 7) Eyes - He is the seer in every person. 8) The Sun - He is in the orb of the sun. 9) Earth - He recovered the Earth from the Ocean. 10) Waters - His seat is in the waters

Vishnu Sahasra Namam: Sloka-58

mahaavaraaho govindah susheNah kanakangadee
guhyo gabheero ahano guptashchakra gadaadharah  58

 govindah

a) One who is praised by the gods (for His help).
b) One who dug out the Earth from the depths of the Ocean.
c) The protector of cows.
d) One who confers the veda-s
e) He who rescued the Earth.
f) He who is known by vedic sentences.
g) He who is responsible for all things that move.

om govindAya namah.

This nAma occurred earlier in sloka 20; the detailed explanation for (a) to (d) were given under Slokam 20.
SrI BhaTTar gives interpretation for  (e) thus:  a variation of explanation (b) under the current nAma viz. bhagavAn is govindah because He rescued the Earth from the rAkshasa.

SrI Sa'nkara gives the interpretationfor (f) under the current nAma: "gobhih - vANibhih vindate" - He Who is known (vid) through words i.e., vedic sentences. SrI Sa'nkara gives the reference from vishNutilaka -
gobhireva yato vedyo govindah samudAhRtah -
"You are named govinda as you are to be known through scriptual texts".

SrI satyadevo vAsishTha derives his interpretation starting from the root gam - gatau - to go (gacchati iti gauh),and gives the meaning "to possess" to the word vid (vid - lAbhe - toget), and thus derives the interpretation (g) above. His explanation is that anything that moves, including our mind, our indriya-s, the Sun, etc., are His possession, and so He is called govindah. He gives this interpretation for the nAma "govidAm patih" also. He supports his interpretation based on"gacchati iti jagat" - BhagavAn is present everywhere as seen by the movement of everything in this world. The life in all things that live is associated with movement, and He is the One who is behind this movement -govindah.

=======================================

Read also:   http://www.tirumala.org/ptv_tm_varaha.htm about the traditinal custom of offering worship to Adi Varaha swamy first and proceeding to Sri Venkatshwara temple only there-after:

Sri Varahaswami Temple in Tirumala is to the north of the Sri Venkateswara Temple, on the banks of Swami Pushkarini.  According to legend, Tirumala was originally Adi Varaha Kshetra (the home of Sri Adi Varaha Swami), and it was with his permission that Lord Sri Venkateswara took up residence here.

According to the Brahma Purana, pilgrims should first offer naivedyam to Sri Adi Varaha Swami, before visiting the Sri Venkateswara Temple. According to Atri Samhita (Samurtarchanadhikara), the Varaha avatara is worshipped in three forms: 

·                     Adi Varaha
·                     Pralaya Varaha
·                     Yajna Varaha 

The idol of Sri Varahaswami in Tirumala is that of Adi Varaha, as it resembles the description of the Adi Varaha murti in Vaikhanasa Agama texts.

The genesis of Sri Varahaswamy Avatarm is given in Canto 3 Chapters 16 - 19 of Srimad Bhagavatam.

_____________________________________
Rajaji's song "kurai onrum illai govinda", sung by MS, chants the glory of Govinda who is present as Archa Murti on the Tirumala hills: ( http://kirtimukha.com/KuraiOnrumIllai.htm )

Kunrin mel kallāki nirkinra varadā
kurai onrum illai, Maraimūrthi kanna!
Manivannā! Malaiyappā! Gōvinda!
Gōvinda! Govinda!Govinda!

_____________________________

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Kurai Onrum Illai Kanna


"Kurai Onrum Illai marai murti Kanna" sung by Smt. M.S. Subbulakshmi is broadcast many times by the TTD on their SVBC TV Channel. The song composed by (late) Chakravarti Rajagopalachari is rich in philosophical content which his grandson Gopal Gandhi has lucidly explained in his article reproduced by Wikipedia at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurai_Onrum_Illai; pl also view the article at my web-site where  I have reproduced the Wiki article and also embedded YouYube links to the soulful music by MS.,

Rajaji has used the words 'kuRai onRum Illai' which have been translated by Gopal Gandhi as 'I have no regret'.  kuRai in Tanil means a lack that is felt by us, generally leading to a desire and action to remove the lack. But such a situation does not arise since all the needs of the devotee are fulfilled by Kannan/Govinda, as stated by Rajaji in the next verse:

Vendiyadhai thandhida Venkatesan enrirukka,
Vendiyadhu ver illai maraimūrthi kanna-
When Venkatesa is there to fulfil our needs
there is nothing else that we need, O Kanna


A heart filled with devotion (bhakti-bhaava) to Govindaa has no kuRai what soever; the devotee sings His praise soulfully and declares: kuRai onrum illai kaNNa, Govinda.

Saturday, July 16, 2011

The Loving Bond

The kite-flier's attitude is a good illustration of loving-caring for the child. The loving bond that does not bind is the thread; pulling and leaving, we succeed in sending it higher in the free atmosphere. We still hold one end of the thread and keep communicating with the kite, feeling the tightness/heaviness as the air keeps pushing the kite up. We don't hold the kite restricted yet the kite flies free -
-- an ideal relationship described by Khalil Gibran thus in his book Prophet:

Your children are not your children.
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
The archer sees the mark upon the path of the infinite, and
He bends you with His might that His arrows may go swift and far.
Let your bending in the archer's hand be for gladness;
For even as he loves the arrow that flies,
so He loves also the bow that is stable.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Who am I? Where am I?

http://bhagavan-ramana.org/ramana_maharshi/books/letters/letter073.html

....... an Andhra gentleman questioned Bhagavan Ramana Maharishi:
“You say the important thing to do is to enquire and find out who I am,
but how is one to find it out? Are we to do japam saying, ‘Who am I? Who am I?’
or should we repeat, ‘Neti’ (not this)? I want to know the exact method, Swami.”
After waiting for a while Bhagavan said,
“What is there to find out? Who is to find out?
There must be some one to find out, mustn’t there?
Who is that someone? Where has that someone come from?
This is the thing to find out first.”
The questioner said, again, “Should there not be some sadhana to find out who one’s self is? Which sadhana will be useful?”
“Yes, it is that that has to be found out. If you ask where to see,
we should say, look within, what is its shape, how was it born, and where was it born;
that is what you have to see or enquire,” said Bhagavan.
The questioner asked again,
“If we ask where this ‘I’ is born, the ancients say, it is in the heart.
How could we see that?”
“Yes, we have to see the heart itself. If you want to see it; the mind must get submerged completely. It is no use doing japam with the words, ‘Who am I? Who am I?’
nor by repeating the words ‘Neti, Neti’,” said Bhagavan.
When the questioner said, that was exactly what he was unable to do,
Bhagavan replied, “Yes, that is so. That is the difficulty.
We always exist and are in all places.
This body and all other attendant things are gathered around us by ourselves only.
There is no difficulty in gathering them. The real difficulty is in throwing them out. We find it difficult to see what is inhering in us and what is foreign to us.
See, what a great tragedy it is,” said Bhagavan.
Some time ago, when a Bengali youth asked similar questions, Bhagavan explained to him at great length. His doubts not being cleared, that youth asked, “You say that the Self is present at all times and at all places. Where exactly is that ‘I’?”
Bhagavan replied with a smile, “When I say you are present at all times and at all places and you ask where is that ‘I’, it is something like asking, when you are in Tiruvannamalai, ‘Where is Tiruvannamalai?’
When you are everywhere, where are you to search? The real delusion is the feeling that you are the body. When you get rid of that delusion, what remains is your Self. You should search for a thing which is not with you but where is the need to search for a thing which is always with you? All sadhanas are for getting rid of the delusion that you are the body. The knowledge that ‘I am’ is always there: call it Atma, or Paramatma or whatever you like. One should get rid of the idea that ‘I am the body’. There is no need to search for that ‘I’ that is the self. That Self is all-pervading.”
*******************
As an illustration of this, I give hereunder the words of Bhagavan in “Unnadhi Nalupadhi”:
Without the Self where is time and where is space?
If we are the body, we have to be bound by time and space. Are we the body?
We are one and identical now, then and always; here, there and everywhere.
So, we are existent, without time and space.” (Reality in Forty Verses, verse 16 )
==========
What are the marks of the Guru’s grace?
It is beyond words or thoughts.
If that is so, how is it that it is said that the disciple realises his true state by the Guru’s grace?
It is like the elephant which wakes up on seeing a lion in its dream.
Even as the elephant wakes up at the mere sight of the lion, so too is it certain that the disciple wakes up from the sleep of ignorance into the wakefulness of true knowledge through the Guru’s benevolent look of grace.
How can there be a connection between the Self which is
pure knowledge and the triple factors which are relative knowledge?
This is, in a way, like the working of a cinema.
The Cinema:
1) The lamp inside (the apparatus) = The Self.
2) The lens in front of the lamp = The pure (sattvic) mind close to the Self
3) The film which is a long series of separate photos = The stream of latent tendencies consisting of subtle thoughts.
4) The lens, the light passing through it and the lamp, which together form the focused light = The mind, the illumination of it and the Self, which together form the seer or the jjva.
5) The light passing through the lens and falling on the screen = The light of the Self emerging from the mind through the senses, and falling on the world
6) The various kinds of pictures appearing in the light of the screen = The various forms and names appearing as the objects perceived in the light of the world
7) The mechanism which sets the film in motion = The divine law manifesting the latent tendencies of the mind.
***
Just as the pictures appear on the screen as long as the film throws the shadows through the lens, so the phenomenal world will continue to appear to the individual in the waking and dream states as long as there are latent mental impressions. Just as the lens magnifies the tiny specks on the film to a huge size and as a number of pictures are shown in a second, so the mind enlarges the sprout-like tendencies into treelike thoughts and shows, in a second, innumerable worlds. Again, just as there is only the light of the lamp visible when there is no film, so the Self alone shines without the triple factors when the mental concepts in the form of tendencies are absent in the states of deep sleep, swoon and samadhi. Just as the lamp illumines the lens, etc. while remaining unaffected, the Self illumines the ego (Chidabhasa) etc., while Itself remaining unaffected.

Saturday, June 25, 2011


Oprah, Elie Wiesel, problem of God Evil

Oprah's interview with Elie Weisel, published in oprah.com is reproduced below. An extract, in which Wiesel reiterates his acceptance of God, inspite of his traumatic experience:

Oprah: Where are you and God with each other these days? Elie Wiesel: We still have a few problems! But even in the camps, I never divorced God. After the war, I went on praying to God. I was angry. I protested. I'm still protesting—and occasionally, I'm still angry. But it's not because of the past, but the present. When I see victims of a tragedy—and especially children—I say to God, "Don't tell me that you have nothing to do with this. You are everywhere—you are God."

If we read our Puranic stories, we notice that God took avatars (literally - came down to earth) *after* atrocities by evil tyrants had happened. In the famous Gita Slokam "*yadaa yadaa hi dharmasya glaanir bhavati*" Krishna assures only that whenever Adharma prevails over Dharma, He comes down to restore the balance in favour of Dharma. There is no explanation as to why adharma was allowed to prevail, in the first instance.
The problem baffling all genuine seekers (not those who merely question to satisfy their intelligent ego), is the obtrusiveness of evil and the absence of a logical explanation for its power and its existence in an universe that owes its origin and existence to God, who is portrayed/postulated as omnipotent and benevolent. One such seeker was British author C.E.M. Joad who was a strong believer in Atheism until about age 40; in his earlier writings, he had denied that an omnipotent God could exist because of the dominance of evil and its power to vanquish good. During World War II, a change came over him and he felt the need for the existence of a power to resist evil since, by oneself, one was powerless. He expressed his views in his new book "God and Evil". The particular events which caused this change in him were the cruel killing of five million defenseless Jewish men, women and children in gas-chambers by Nazi Germany and the many horrors of World War II including the total destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki cities with atom-bombs that killed almost the entire civilian population of the two cities.
In the first part of this book, he argues elaborately that every logical explanation to reconcile the two positions was bound to fail and then proceeds to Part II of the book commencing with the statement: ".... the conclusions of the intellect deny that the orthodox God of the religious hypothesis - omnipotent and benevolent, could have been the creator of the world; and deny it precisely because of the fact of evil. But if the intellect denies what the heart demands, what then?”
He answers: “...perhaps the deadlock is a sign of, perhaps it is even a punishment for, intellectual arrogance...The considerations which have set my mind working again on the problems of religion are of an emotional order .....the emotions are those connected with inadequacy. The life that lacks religion lacks, so I have come to feel, fullness and roundness, and the desire to find that true which I have always believed to be false, to know something of that which I have thought to be unknowable grows as the years pass by. One is dismayed by the evil at large in the world and in oneself, depressed and humiliated by the inadequacy of one's efforts to cope with it, humiliated then by the inadequacy of one's own self. It is from precisely such a feeling of humiliation that, religious writers have often urged, the search for and need of God, take their rise. What is more, the seeker who is inspired by such a mood may not be wholly without hope of succeeding in his quest. For alienated by intellectual pride, they have assured us, God draws nearer to those who approach Him in humbleness of spirit."
====================================

From Oprah Winfrey's web-site: http://www2.oprah.com/omagazine/200011/omag_200011_elie_b.jhtml

OPRAH'S CUT WITH ELIE WIESEL

He's one of the people I most respect: Elie Wiesel. After I first read his memoir *Night* seven years ago, I was not the same—you can't be the same after hearing how Elie, at age 15, survived the horror of the Holocaust death camps. Through his eyes, we witness the depths of both human cruelty and human grace—and we're left grappling with what remains of Elie, a teenage boy caught between the two. I gain courage from his courage. The story—and especially that number, six million—numbs us: A Jew hater named Adolf Hitler rises to power in Germany, the world goes to war in 1939, and when the showdown is over six years later, the tyrant has slaughtered six million Jews. Six million. Inconceivable. We see footage of the concentration camps, the gas chambers, the gallows.Yet words like Holocaust and Auschwitz are still abstractions—seemingly impossible until we see photos of someone who was there: a Face, Eyes, Hair, Prison numbers tattooed into an arm, a real person like Elie Wiesel who, 55 years ago, made it through the atrocity.
"How could you live through the Holocaust and not be bitter?" I ask Elie. At 72, he emanates quiet strength; with his strong handgrip, it's as if he's saying, "I assure you—I am alive." We sit across from each other at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in Manhattan, where hundreds come to see evidence of what happened to the Jewish people. Thousands already know Elie Wiesel's name—he is a prolific writer, a professor at Boston University and an activist who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986—but I want him to take me back to the time when living to tell the story was the last thing that mattered to him. I wanted to know: "What does it take to be normal again, after having your humanity stripped away by the Nazis?"

"What is abnormal is that I am normal," he says. "That I survived the Holocaust and went on to love beautiful girls, to talk, to write, to have toast and tea and live my life—that is what is abnormal." "Why didn't you go insane?" "To this day," he says, "that is a mystery to me." and a miracle. After he was liberated from Buchenwald in 1945, he and other orphans were sent to France. There, he lived in an orphanage, then later supported himself as a tutor and choir director—and he decided that he wanted to live again. He studied literature, philosophy and psychology at the Sorbonne, and in 1952 he became a reporter for a newspaper in Tel Aviv. For ten years after his release, he vowed not to speak of his experience. "I wanted to be sure that the words I was going to use about this event were the proper words," he has said.
In our time together, Elie and I talk about how it is possible that he can still believe in the sovereignty of a force bigger than himself, why he has no explanation for his survival in the death camps, and what, five decades after Auschwitz, brings him what he calls real joy.

Oprah: There may be no better person than you to speak about living with gratitude. Despite all the tragedy you've witnessed, do you still have a place inside you for gratefulness?
Elie Wiesel: Absolutely. Right after the war, I went around telling people, "Thank you just for living, for being human." And to this day, the words that come most frequently from my lips are ‘thank you’. When a person doesn't have gratitude, something is missing in his or her humanity. A person can almost be defined by his or her attitude toward gratitude.

O: Does having seen the worst of humanity make you more grateful for ordinary occurrences?
EW: For me, every hour is grace. And I feel gratitude in my heart each time I can meet someone and look at his or her smile.
O: Did you ever hate your oppressors?
EW: I had anger but never hate. Before the war, I was too busy studying [the Bible and the Cabala] to hate. After the war, I thought, What's the use? To hate would be to reduce myself.
O: On your first night in the camp, you saw babies being thrown into the flames. Can you ever forgive those who killed the children?
EW: Who am I to forgive? Only the children themselves could forgive. If I forgive, I should do it in their name. Otherwise, it is arrogant.
O: By becoming a voice for those who are suffering, are you doing what the world did not do for Jews during the Holocaust?
EW: I've gone everywhere, trying to stop so many atrocities: Bosnia, Kosovo, Macedonia. The least I can do is show the victims that they are not alone. When I went to Cambodia, journalists asked me, "What are you doing here? This is not a Jewish tragedy." I answered, "When I needed people to come, they didn't. That's why I am here."
O: Is it our indifference and arrogance that makes us Americans feel that we are the center of the universe—that a mother's pain after losing her child in Bosnia or Nigeria isn't as important as our own pain?
EW: I wouldn't generalize. There are people in America who are so sensitive. Whenever I meet young Americans abroad, they are there to help. A doctor in New York read a quote of mine that sparked her involvement. Somebody had asked me, "What is the most important commandment in the Bible?" and I said, "Thou shalt not stand idly by." So she packed up her office and went to Macedonia—I met her there... We cannot free all the prisoners in the world or save all the victims of AIDS, but we can at least show them that we are with them.
O: You and the others in the camp were forced to march by three people who were hanged. And somebody behind you whispered, "Where is God?"
EW: A voice in me said, "God is there."
O: Where are you and God with each other these days?
EW: We still have a few problems! But even in the camps, I never divorced God. After the war, I went on praying to God. I was angry. I protested. I'm still protesting—and occasionally, I'm still angry. But it's not because of the past, but the present. When I see victims of a tragedy—and especially children—I say to God, "Don't tell me that you have nothing to do with this. You are everywhere—you are God."
O: Did you come out of the horror of the Holocaust with your ability to love intact?
EW: After my liberation, I fell in love with every girl—consecutively. But I would never dare tell a girl that I loved her, because I was timid—and afraid of rejection. I missed so many opportunities because I was afraid to say what I felt. I needed to love more than I needed to be loved. I needed to know that I could love—that after all I had seen, there was love in my heart.
O: Do you remember the day you were released from the camp?
EW: April 11, 1945. The Americans were close by, and a few days before that, on April 5, the Germans had decided to evacuate all the Jews. Every day, they would evacuate thousands—and most were killed upon leaving. I was in a children's block with other adolescents, and we were left until the end. [But every day we marched to the gate anyway.] I was near the gate more than five times before I was released, and each time, the gate closed just before I came to it.
O: How do you explain that you survived the camps?
EW: I have no explanation.
O: You—someone who has studied the Talmud, the Cabala—have no explanation?
EW: Believe me, I have tried to know, but I do not. If it is God, I have problems with that. If he bothered to save me, why couldn't he have saved all the others? There were people worthier than I.
O: Don't you think your survival has something to do with who you've become and what you've said to the world about the Holocaust?
EW: No, no, no. The price is too high. Because I survived, I must do everything possible to help others.

A few relevant Quotes:
We might well pray for God to invade and conquer us, for until He does, we remain in peril from a thousand foes. We bear within us the seeds of our own disintegration. The strength of our flesh is an ever present danger to our souls. Deliverance can come to us only by the defeat of our old life. Safety and peace come only after we have been forced to our knees. So He conquers us and by that benign conquest saves us for Himself.-A. W. Tozer
Whatever be our conception of the universe we must, it is obvious, start somehow; we must begin with something; and the something with which we begin, from the very fact that we do begin with it, must itself be without explanation, since, if something else were invoked to explain it, then the "something else" must needs be logically prior to that which it is invoked to explain. Thus the "something" being explained by a logically prior "something else" could not have been ultimate. -- C. E. M. Joad, in God and Evil
Some day you will read in the papers that D. L. Moody of East Northfield, is dead. Don't you believe a word of it! At that moment I shall be more alive than I am now; I shall have gone up higher, that is all, out of this old clay tenement into a house that is immortal -- a body that death cannot touch, that sin cannot taint; a body fashioned like unto His glorious body. I was born of the flesh in 1837. I was born of the Spirit in 1856. That which is born of the flesh may die. That which is born of the Spirit will live forever. ... Dwight Lyman Moody
If we consider the lives of people who believe in God, we so often find that they make good sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, husbands, wives, employers, and employees -- they have many individual virtues; but they have no way of life other than that which has been imposed upon them by their environment. It is their sociological conditions, their social class, their neighbourhood, their national characteristics, rather than their spiritual faith, which determine their outlook and values: they are an overwhelming demonstration that it is the economic conditions and background of one's life which determine what one is and what one will think. This is an intolerable condition, and so long as it persists we shall not be able to make any impact on the world, because it will be abundantly clear that it is the world which is making its impact upon us.
... Douglas Rhymes, in "The Place of the Laity in the Parish"
When anger enters the mind, wisdom departs. -- Thomas à Kempis